Heoist Philosophy; Heoism: A modern Socialist political philosophy for unifying and liberating all the people of Sol; https://heoism.neocities.org
| About | Copy & Use Policy | Main | Daily Clicks | BlueSky | Recommended Breadtubers | Selected Works | Assorted Works | Statements | Glossary |

About the Webmaster


This website's webmaster is a Queer, Transgender, and Autistic Communist sociopolitical philosopher, amateur digital artist, and rudimentary autodidactic programmer. You can call me Hespera (She/Her) during the initial propagation of Heoism. I created this website to host my developing political philosophy in one cohesive location, where I can speak freely in my own space and organize and decorate as I find comfortable. I'm slowly working to improve the legibility and visual aesthetics of this website; consequently, this website will likely be under a perpetual status of construction.

I describe myself as a Communist and a Socialist, but can also be described as a Marxist, Maoist, or Heoist to describe my political philosophy. I'm most interested in eschewing leftist infighting and fomenting a new era of inter-leftist praxis—not in the fruitless attempt to merge all Socialists into a single philosophy, but rather to mutually understand that our irreconcilable differences in philosophy are only incompatible on a surface level, and can instead be used to create a Socialist republic with different states and anarchocommunes that cooperate with each other on a global scale as the Communist alternative to the farcically symbolic status of the current and capitalist United Nations, which I regularly refer to as the Socialist Republic of Sol.

I'm technically a member of the Socialist Party USA (SPUSA), but find them to be as farcically symbolic as the United Nations. The SPUSA is an American nationalist party that describes itself as Socialist—and their Wikipedia page (at time of writing) is incorrectly described as a big-tent Socialist party—but refuses to engage in anything beyond Debsian Socialism[1]: non-violent and slow revision of the existing American state without disruption or drastic change. I cannot help but be reminded by Lenin's criticism of the Social Democratic movement in "What Is To Be Done?".[2]

They have refused to work alongside the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA, who have their own problems), the Revolutionary Communist Party (RevCom[site link deprecated]), the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), or the Socialist Rifle Association (SocialistRA, SRA). I doubt they would be willing to work with the Revolutionary Communists of America (RCA), the Black Panther Party (BPP[hover for more information]), or the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO), and thus haven't even bothered to discuss it with their leadership. The Green Party USA (GPUSA, GP) have proven more open to inter-Socialist organization, but I no longer see a Socialist future wherein the American Empire still exists.

They have lied to their own members about the alleged explosion of their party membership, while their Directory page has demonstrably shrunk its representation since the second election of Trump. They have repeatedly espoused public campaigns that have not demonstrably shown any praxis, betraying that the party cares more about appearances, theory, and statements than action. They do not issue physical copies of their two-page party newsletter, The Organizer, (at least not within at-large regions) and therefore irresponsibly leave the dissemination of party information to the regular autonomous monitoring of their website on a constant basis lest party ignorance develop. They have even allowed their website to be programmed in such an amateur manner that their newsletter, at time of writing[22 May 2025], rather than correctly linking to their January 2025 edition, instead inexplicably links to their November 2023 edition.

With this in mind, I hereby formally allege that the clearly American nationalist, supposedly Socialist but demonstrably antithetical to organizing, SPUSA to be a party that, however unintentionally, serves to uphold fascist praxis.

In other connections, I work as a member of an international trade union, but refuse to elaborate on the internal political developments of the union local. I have additionally become a de facto Commissar, formal election pending, but again I refuse to elaborate any further.

While I don't currently have a dedicated email for this Neocities website, I encourage discussion in this website's comments section, as well as this website's officially dedicated Bluesky page, to facilitate direct communication and philosophical discussion with my fellow proletarians. I am enthusiastically interested in discussion with Anarchists, Marxist-Leninists, and non-American Socialists, as I am most familiar with American and European Socialism, but am less informed on other cultures' Socialist theory and praxis.


References

  1. Wikipedia - Eugene V. Debs | Accessed 22 May 2025 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_V._Debs)
  2. "The rupture, of course, did not occur because the 'allies' proved to be bourgeois democrats. On the contrary, the representatives of the latter trend are natural and desirable allies of Social-Democracy insofar as its democratic tasks, brought to the fore by the prevailing situation in Russia, are concerned. But an essential condition for such an alliance must be the full opportunity for the socialists to reveal to the working class that its interests are diametrically opposed to the interests of the bourgeoisie. However, the Bernsteinian and 'critical' trend, to which the majority of the legal Marxists turned, deprived the socialists of this opportunity and demoralised the socialist consciousness by vulgarising Marxism, by advocating the theory of the blunting of social contradictions, by declaring the idea of the social revolution and of the dictatorship of the proletariat to be absurd, by reducing the working-class movement and the class struggle to narrow trade-unionism and to a 'realistic' struggle for petty, gradual reforms. This was synonymous with bourgeois democracy's denial of socialism's right to independence and, consequently, of its right to existence; in practice it meant a striving to convert the nascent working-class movement into an appendage of the liberals." —Vladimir Lenin, What Is To Be Done?, I: Dogmatism and "Freedom of Criticism", C: Criticism in Russia, pp. 4